Getting Started with AI Talking Head Sync: A Beginner’s Guide

If you have ever watched a talking-head clip and thought, “The words are there, but the face is off,” you already understand the job of AI talking head sync. It is the moment where the mouth movement, timing, and delivery start to feel like one performance instead of two separate files stitched together.

When it works, it’s surprisingly convincing. When it doesn’t, it’s obvious in seconds. This beginner guide is built around that reality, so you can move from “I can generate a clip” to “I can ship something that looks synced, reads naturally, and doesn’t fight the viewer.”

Start with the inputs that make sync easier

Before you touch any timeline tools, make your raw materials as friendly as possible. AI talking head sync basics are mostly about reducing confusion for the system: clean audio, clear pacing, and a face that can handle the motion you are asking for.

Audio first, because timing lives there

Your voice track is the clock. If the audio is noisy, clipped, or oddly paced, the mouth shapes will try to compensate and often miss the rhythm.

A simple sanity check I use before any sync work: – Listen end-to-end. – Make sure you can understand every word at normal volume. – Note where sentences speed up or slow down.

Even small issues matter, like breaths getting too loud, or a late punch-in that changes the timing of the first consonants.

Script formatting helps more than you’d think

For talking head sync tutorial workflows, short, readable lines often behave better than huge paragraphs. The sync models can track phonemes and emphasis more reliably when the delivery is structured.

If you are writing from scratch, aim for conversational sentence length. If you are adapting existing copy, break long sentences into smaller chunks and keep punctuation meaningful. A period usually signals a reset in rhythm. Commas signal shorter pauses. Your voiceover will follow those cues, and sync will benefit.

Choose a talking head that matches your delivery style

Some faces handle subtle expressions better. Others look great for direct-to-camera delivery but get uncanny when the performance includes wide mouth shapes or strong emphasis.

Practical tip: if your script is emotionally intense, you want a model that supports expressive mouth movement without drifting eyes or exaggerated smearing. If your script is calm and instructional, you can prioritize natural head steadiness and clean articulation.

Do a first-pass sync test, then iterate with intention

The biggest mistake beginners make is trying to nail everything in one go. Instead, do a first-pass test designed to reveal the specific failure mode.

In my experience, sync problems usually fall into a handful of patterns. Once you can label it, you can fix it faster.

Common sync failure modes

• Mouth starts too early or too late compared to consonants
• Lip movement matches roughly, but vowels look “stretched”
• The audio feels synced, but the head motion lags or overreacts
• Specific words break the illusion, especially tricky consonant clusters
• The clip looks fine at full screen, but uncanny on a smaller preview

When you see one of these, don’t blanket-adjust everything. Focus on the layer that is causing the mismatch. For example, if the lip movement is consistently late, you likely need timing alignment adjustments in your workflow, not a completely new voice.

Treat your first test like a calibration

Pick a segment that is representative, usually 20 to 45 seconds. Avoid the intro and outro for the first calibration. Intros often include greetings that are delivered differently than the main content, and outros often include slower pacing or tag lines.

Run your talking head sync guide workflow on that segment, then review it in two ways: – Watch it once for overall believability. – Watch it again looking specifically at the mouth during consonants, not just during vowels.

If you are using preview tools, zoom in slightly during review. Small timing errors become obvious when you can see the lips close and open relative to the waveform.

Learn the workflow knobs that actually control sync

Now for the part you are probably eager to get to: how to sync talking heads AI in a way that produces stable results. Different tools label settings differently, but the underlying controls are similar. Your goal is to understand what each knob influences.

Timing alignment

This includes offset controls, start alignment, and sometimes waveform-based sync. If your talking head is always late by the same amount, an offset adjustment can fix a lot quickly.

Begin with small adjustments. A change that sounds tiny in a settings box can be huge on screen. If you have the option to scrub frame-by-frame, do it for a few consonant-heavy words like “bird,” “best,” or “together.” Pick words with clear mouth closures and reopenings.

Lip sync intensity and smoothing

Some workflows let you control how strongly the mouth follows the audio, or how aggressively it smooths transitions. Higher intensity can look great, until it becomes too literal and starts to look cartoonish. More smoothing can make it feel natural, until it lags the audio on quick syllables.

My preference for beginner projects is moderate intensity with conservative smoothing, then adjust only if the mouth feels floaty or too stiff.

Expression blending

If there’s a setting for facial expression strength, use it like seasoning. Too little and the face looks dead. Too much and the performance starts to fight the voice, especially when the script is neutral.

A clean trick is to match expression to the script punctuation. Exclamation points and strong contrasts should get more energy. Plain informational sentences should stay controlled.

Camera motion and stabilization choices

Even if lip sync is perfect, camera movement can break the illusion. If your talking head sync tutorial tool allows it, keep camera motion minimal for your first attempts. Later, once the face reads correctly, you can introduce subtle motion.

If the preview includes aggressive motion blur, consider reducing it for sync work. Clarity helps you spot when the mouth closes on the wrong frame.

Fix hard words and tricky segments without ruining the whole clip

Every voiceover has a few words that cause problems, and sync models are no exception. The tricky part is handling those moments without overcorrecting and degrading the rest of the clip.

Targeted re-records beat global changes

If one sentence consistently looks wrong, it’s often faster to re-record just that sentence with clearer delivery. Ask for a slightly stronger consonant and a cleaner pause at the comma or period.

You can also try adjusting the pacing for that line, not the entire script. Even a 5 percent slower delivery can improve mouth closure timing for certain clusters, because the consonants become more distinct.

Use a small editing pass, then lock it

When you identify a problematic word or two, do a brief targeted pass: 1. Re-check the waveform alignment for the segment. 2. Adjust timing offset only for that section, if your tool supports it. 3. Re-run sync for the minimum necessary duration.

This approach keeps your overall timing stable, instead of forcing the model to re-learn a whole clip’s rhythm.

Beware of “looks synced” but not “sounds synced”

There’s a sneaky failure mode where the mouth shapes match reasonably well, but the head nods, eye blinks, or micro expressions drift relative to emphasis in the audio. Viewers feel that mismatch even if they cannot articulate it.

If your workflow includes separate controls for facial motion versus mouth timing, prioritize matching emphasis first, then finesse the rest.

Build a simple export checklist for AI presenter sync guide results

Once you have something that feels synced, you still need to validate it like a creator, not like a tester. Export settings and playback conditions can change what looks acceptable.

Here’s a practical checklist I use before I consider a clip “ready” for posting or internal review:

• Watch at full screen, then at thumbnail size for at least 10 seconds
• Scrub to the start of sentences and check consonant timing
• Confirm audio loudness stays consistent across the clip
• Keep background motion low, especially behind the face
• Export a short sample first, then only render the full project after it checks out

The trick is to reduce surprises. A clip that looks perfect during editing can fall apart after compression, resizing, or platform playback. Sync errors often become more visible when the image is downscaled.

When you follow this beginner’s workflow, you build a practical intuition for what AI talking head sync can handle well and where you need human judgment. That intuition is what turns a first experiment into a repeatable production process, and it’s what will make your next AI presenter sync guide project go faster with every iteration.

Exploring Alternatives to AI Video Dubbing: Pros and Cons

Why people start looking beyond AI video dubbing

AI video dubbing is convenient. You hit a button, choose target languages, and the clip sounds “close enough” for many viewers. But once you use it on real projects, the limitations show up fast, especially when the video is mission-critical or branded.

I’ve seen this pattern repeatedly. A team runs a pilot on a marketing ad, the first version lands, and everyone gets excited. Then they try the same workflow on a product demo with technical terminology, or they overlay subtitles to match the new audio, and they notice the mismatch. The voice might be intelligible, but the timing, stress, and intent can drift. Viewers may not know why it feels off, but they feel it.

That’s where alternatives to AI video dubbing start to matter. When you choose a different approach, you’re usually trading one type of problem for another. The goal is to pick the trade-off that fits your use case, your audience, and your tolerance for cost and turnaround time.

Below are the most practical paths people take when they’re weighing alternatives to ai video dubbing, including how “human vs ai video dubbing” tends to play out in real deliverables.

Option 1: Manual video dubbing services (voice actors and editors)

Manual video dubbing services are the most traditional route, and they’re still the gold standard when you need polish. A human team typically handles casting, translation, script adaptation, recording, audio engineering, and final mixing.

Pros

• Natural performance and acting: A skilled voice actor can mirror pacing, emphasis, and emotion, especially in dialogue heavy scenes.
• Better handling of nuance: Humor, sarcasm, and cultural references can be adapted instead of forced into literal translations.
• Cleaner technical delivery: When a product name, street address, or medical term needs exact pronunciation, humans are far more reliable.
• More control over synchronization: Editors can align syllables to mouth movements when that’s part of your workflow.

Cons

• Higher cost per language: You pay for talent, studio time, and coordination. Scaling to many languages can get expensive.
• Longer turnaround: Translation review, recording sessions, and edits add time.
• You still need QA: Even great performances can drift if the script adapter doesn’t account for on-screen timing and visuals.

In practice, manual dubbing shines for premium content: training videos with compliance requirements, flagship campaigns, and anything where viewers are actively listening rather than passively scrolling.

Option 2: Human-only dubbing without full video retiming

Some teams choose a middle ground: hire human voice actors and translators, but keep the editing workflow lighter. The audio is dubbed in the target language and mixed cleanly, while retiming for strict lip sync may be limited or avoided.

When this works especially well

This approach is often a smart fit for: – talking-head segments where mouth movement is less critical – documentary style narration – educational videos where viewers prioritize clarity over perfect lip alignment

Pros

• More natural voice than AI dubbing with less of the heavy engineering cost.
• Faster than full post-production because you’re not doing detailed mouth-sync work across every frame.
• Easier iteration when stakeholders request wording changes.

Cons

• Mouth-to-audio mismatch may be noticeable on close-ups.
• You still need careful script adaptation, not just translation. Literal wording can create unnatural timing even if the voice acting is strong.

I like this option when the budget can’t support full manual video dubbing services, but the brand or subject matter demands human delivery. It’s often the “best bang for quality” choice.

Option 3: AI dubbing substitutes that focus on human direction

Not all “AI dubbing substitutes” are meant to replace humans completely. Some workflows use AI tools for drafting, phoneme alignment, or rough voice generation, but keep humans in the loop to guide performance and catch errors.

Here’s the trade: you gain speed and affordability, but you still depend on human reviewers to ensure the final output matches intent and pronunciation.

Pros

• Rapid iteration: It’s easier to test multiple script versions and keep moving.
• Lower upfront cost than full manual dubbing for early drafts.
• Useful for scale: You can produce first-pass audio across many languages, then refine only what needs it.

Cons

• Performance consistency varies: When you switch between styles or languages, the “feel” can wobble.
• Pronunciation edge cases can slip through. Brand names and proper nouns are common trouble spots.
• Stakeholder confidence is harder: Some teams hesitate to publish until they’ve run multiple review cycles.

A practical way to do this safely

If you go this route, build in human checkpoints. Don’t just listen once and approve. Do a focused pass on (1) proper nouns, (2) technical terms, and (3) emotional intent in key lines. That’s usually where quality either holds up or falls apart.

Human vs AI video dubbing: the real decision points

When people ask about human vs ai video dubbing, they often mean two things: sound quality and trust. In my experience, both are driven by the same set of decisions you make early.

Here are the factors that most predict whether an alternative will outperform ai video dubbing for your specific project:

1. Whether timing and lip sync matter to your viewers
   If your content is mostly close-ups, you’ll feel mismatch more quickly.

2. How technical or brand-specific the script is
   The more specialized the vocabulary, the more value you get from a human script adapter and voice actor.

3. How much emotion is in the performance
   If the message relies on tone, pauses, and emphasis, humans usually deliver a more consistent result.

4. How many languages you need
   Scaling can flip the economics. Sometimes a faster workflow wins, then you refine a smaller subset later.

5. Your QA tolerance
   If you can’t spend time reviewing line-by-line, you may prefer a workflow designed for fewer revisions.

Choosing the best alternative to ai video dubbing for your project

The “right” alternative depends less on what’s fashionable and more on what you’re protecting. Are you protecting brand voice? Are you protecting comprehension? Are you protecting deadlines?

Here’s how I’d approach selection on a real AI video workflow:

• If your priority is maximum naturalness, go with manual video dubbing services and let professionals handle translation adaptation, recording, and mixing.
• If your priority is natural speech with manageable cost, consider human-only dubbing without heavy retiming, especially for narration and talking-head formats.
• If your priority is speed for pilots and multilingual experimentation, use AI drafting as a starting point, but keep humans in review so pronunciation and intent don’t drift.

One more detail people often overlook: the dubbing process is not only about audio. It’s about the whole viewing experience. Even the best voiceover can feel wrong if the script adaptation ignores on-screen beats, if the pacing doesn’t match the visuals, or if the volume mix competes with music.

When you step back and treat dubbing as a production problem instead of a “generate audio” task, the trade-offs become clearer. Alternatives to ai video dubbing are not just substitutes, they’re different production philosophies. Some optimize for speed, others for acting and accuracy. Your job is to pick which philosophy fits the moment your audience is actually watching and listening.

Voice Cloning for Video Localization: A Beginner’s Step-by-Step Guide

What “voice cloning for video localization” actually means

When people hear “voice cloning,” they often picture a sci-fi impersonation trick. In video localization, the point is much more practical: you want the dubbed or localized narration to match a specific on-screen speaker, so the audience feels like the words belong to the character.

In practice, voice cloning for video localization usually means you take a target voice (the actor, presenter, or character voice), create a voice model from training audio, and then generate new lines that fit your localized script. Then you line those generated lines up with the video timing, so the delivery feels natural, not robotic.

If you have ever watched a localized trailer where the lip movement and the audio never quite meet, you already understand why people care. Good localization is less about translation accuracy and more about the whole sensory package: pacing, intonation, and speaker identity.

A useful way to think about it: voice cloning is only one part of localization. The other parts are timing, phrasing, and post-production cleanup. When beginners focus only on “getting a voice,” they miss the parts that decide whether the final video feels believable.

A quick reality check before you start

Voice cloning basics for localization tend to work best when: – The original speaker is clearly audible in the source audio – You have enough clean recordings to represent the range of speech (soft, normal, emphatic) – Your localized script preserves tone and sentence rhythm, not just meaning

If your source audio is noisy, heavily processed, or full of overlapping dialogue, you will spend more time fixing artifacts than making progress. That’s not a failure, it’s just a signal to adjust expectations and workflow.

Step 1 – Pick your localization workflow and voice data strategy

Before you touch any ai voice cloning tools, decide how you will handle the video pipeline. There are two common approaches:

1. Clone, then dub
   You generate localized speech from the cloned voice, then you edit it into the video with timing tools and audio cleanup.

2. Use the cloned voice as a performance layer
   You localize first, then you shape the performance to match delivery and cadence. This often includes multiple takes or variations per line.

For beginners, “clone, then dub” is easier to manage because you keep the process linear. The most important decision is your voice data.

Collect voice samples like a production, not a downloader

You are not just gathering audio files. You are curating a voice print.

Here’s what I’ve found makes a meaningful difference for how stable the cloned voice sounds: – Capture audio in the same style as the on-screen speaker, same mic, same distance – Prefer many short clips over one huge file, because you’ll capture more emotional variety – Avoid clips where the speaker is interrupted, laughing off-mic, or yelling with distortion – Keep track of speaking speed. If the source is slow and your localization script is fast, you’ll fight timing later

If you only have a few seconds of usable audio, you can still test voice cloning, but it may struggle with consistent pronunciation and expressive delivery. That’s where iteration becomes the real skill.

Step 2 – Prepare audio and scripts for believable localization

Once you have your voice samples, your next job is to prepare for two constraints: audio quality and performance alignment.

Clean up and segment the training audio

You can think of training audio as your raw ingredient list. If your ingredients are contaminated, everything you cook tastes off.

I recommend segmenting clips into small, clean utterances, and labeling them so you know which ones represent calm speech, stressed emphasis, questions, and so on. When you later generate localized lines, you can often pick settings or prompt styles that resemble your best-matching source examples.

Also, be mindful of how much “processing” is already baked into your source recordings. Heavy noise reduction, aggressive compression, or strong reverb can become part of the voice character in ways you did not intend.

Rewrite the localization script for timing, not just meaning

This is where beginners get surprised. Translation can be correct and still feel wrong when dubbed with a cloned voice.

For video localization voice cloning tutorial style work, I often adjust the script with three checks in mind: – Syllable pacing: Does the sentence land at the same speed as the original? – Stress pattern: Are the key words emphasized in a similar way? – Pauses: Do you need commas and short breaks to match cut points?

A practical technique is to mark your script with “beat breaks.” Then, when you generate the localized audio, you can encourage more natural phrasing that lines up with those beats.

Step 3 – Train or set up voice cloning, then generate localized lines

Now the fun part. You bring your cleaned voice samples into a voice cloning pipeline and start generating localized speech that matches your target speaker.

The exact controls vary by tool, but the workflow usually has the same shape. You create a voice model, then you generate audio for each line or segment of your localized script.

Generate with performance in mind, not just pronunciation

In voice cloning for video localization, beginners often ask, “Can it say the words?” Yes. The better question is, “Can it sound like the same person making the same kind of choices?”

A few things to watch during generation: – Pronunciation drift: Names and technical terms often need careful handling – Energy level: If the original speaker is enthusiastic, but your generated audio is flat, it will feel off immediately – Consistency across takes: If you generate everything in one pass, you might get variation across lines. Generating in smaller segments and selecting the best take can help

When you generate audio, do short batches first. You want to validate quality on one or two lines before committing to the full script.

Step 4 – Time it to the video and clean up the audio

Even a great cloned voice can fail localization if the timing and mix are wrong. This is the “make it look real” stage.

Your goal is to align the generated narration with visual actions, camera cuts, and any lip movement cues. Even when you are not doing perfect lip sync, you still want believable timing.

Timing and polish workflow that usually works

Here is a practical sequence I use on beginner projects: – Place each generated line in the timeline where it starts speaking in the source cut – Trim silences so the first consonant hits the visual intent – Smooth transitions at sentence boundaries, especially where the video cuts or the speaker breathes – Apply light EQ and noise shaping to match the original audio style – Add reverb or room tone only if your source recording has it consistently

Two trade-offs to keep in mind: 1. Too much cleanup can erase character. If you over-process, the voice can sound different from the target. 2. Perfect timing is expensive. You can spend hours chasing milliseconds for every line. For many projects, human perception cares more about overall pacing and key emphasis than absolute sync at the phoneme level.

If you have access to the original audio track, matching its loudness and spectral character helps the cloned voice sit naturally in the mix. If you do not, you’ll rely more on consistent generation and gentle post-processing.

Step 5 – Test, iterate, and keep quality consistent across the whole video

Localization projects feel overwhelming because there is always another line, another cut, another segment. The key is building an iteration loop so you do not reinvent the process every time.

A lightweight quality checklist you can reuse

Use the same quick checks per segment, and you’ll catch issues early:

• Does the cloned voice sound like the same speaker across different lines?
• Are questions, emphasis, and calm moments preserved well enough for the genre?
• Do pauses feel natural when compared with the visuals?
• Are there any mispronounced names or repeated words?
• Does the audio level match the rest of the track without noticeable jumps?

If something fails, isolate the failure mode. Is it a script issue, a voice data issue, or a timing issue? Beginners often fix the wrong layer first, like regenerating everything when the real problem is pacing in the localized script.

And yes, you will iterate. Even mature workflows refine their settings per project, especially when the source audio quality varies or the localized language has different word lengths.

If you want to keep momentum, treat your first localized minutes as a pilot. Once the pilot feels solid, expanding to the full video becomes much faster, because you already know which settings and editing habits work for your specific speaker and edit style.

5 Alternatives to Real Time Avatar Video Services You Should Try Now

If you have ever tried to build a live, talking-head experience with a real time avatar video service, you already know the good parts and the annoyances. The good part is obvious: it feels immediate. The annoying part shows up fast too, especially when your script changes mid-run, your audience expects very specific timing, or you need multiple presenters for different segments.

In practice, many teams do not actually need true real time. They need something that looks consistent, sounds right, and can be produced quickly when the calendar gets tight. That is where real time avatar video alternatives start to make sense. You can keep the “presenter energy” without locking yourself into a single workflow that may not fit how you ship.

Below are five options I have seen work well for real projects, along with what to watch so you do not end up trading one headache for another.

1) Avatar creation software options that produce “near live” clips

If your goal is regular outbound content, training modules, or product explainers, avatar creation software options can be the sweet spot. They let you generate segments quickly, then assemble them like a show.

The main difference from real time is that you send a script or voice track, generate the video, and move on. That sounds slower until you try it with a decent pipeline. When your edits are text-based and your avatar output is reliable, you can iterate in minutes, not hours.

Where this shines – You need consistent delivery across multiple videos – You want to keep brand voice stable – You are producing batches, not one-off live demos

A practical workflow that works – Write the script in short sections (2 to 4 sentences) – Record or generate voice first – Generate each segment, then stitch with captions and B-roll

Trade-offs to consider

• You may see mouth timing differences compared to live performances.
• Rapid script changes mid-session are harder, but iterative reshoots are often faster.

2) Script-to-video platforms for presenter-style assets

Some best avatar video platforms focus less on the “avatar as a live performer” idea and more on generating polished presenter clips from text. Think of them as production tools, not stage tools.

When I recommend this route, it is usually for teams that need a reliable content engine. You can create a video draft from a script, apply styling, and keep the output consistent across weeks. That matters a lot for marketing and internal communications, where the value is in repeatability.

What to look for

Here is what I would evaluate before you commit: 1. Control over voice and pacing 2. Subtitle and caption quality 3. Ability to swap backgrounds and framing quickly 4. Reuse options for the same avatar across many scripts 5. Export formats that fit your editing workflow

If you use captions and overlays heavily, platforms that handle text cleanly can save you hours in post.

Trade-offs to consider

• If you need extremely specific gesture timing, you may need extra editing or a more custom avatar approach.
• Output quality can vary by style, especially for long videos.

3) Voice first, then avatar animation using your own audio

One of the most effective ways to improve realism is to stop treating voice and video as a single locked system. Instead, build the voice you want first, then feed it into the avatar generation step.

This is not only about quality. It is about control. When the voice track already nails the emotion and the pauses, the avatar’s job becomes much easier. In real projects, the “uncanny” feeling often comes from voice timing that does not match the visual delivery.

How it plays out in real work – You generate or record a strong voice track – You align breathing and emphasis with your storyboard beats – You generate avatar animation from that stabilized audio

If you manage multiple languages or different audience versions, this approach also helps. You can keep the same visual template and swap audio tracks.

Trade-offs to consider

• You still have to review mouth shapes and stop consonants.
• Some avatar tools respond better to certain audio formats, so test your pipeline early.

4) Modular presenter studios: split-screen, overlays, and hybrid layouts

Not every “presenter video” has to be a full screen talking head. Hybrid layouts are often faster and more forgiving than strict avatar footage. Modular presenter studios let you combine avatar segments, on-screen text, stock or custom B-roll, and layout transitions.

This is one of those strategies that sounds simple until you try it. Once you move to a structured format, you can hide imperfections in facial animation while still giving the audience the sense of a real presenter.

Where hybrid formats help most

• Product demos with frequent visual context
• Training videos with steps, diagrams, and callouts
• Announcements that require tight branding and typography

A quick example: if your script includes “Step one: open the dashboard,” you can show the avatar on the left, while the right side displays a screen capture. Even if the avatar delivery is slightly imperfect, the user stays focused because the visuals do the heavy lifting.

Trade-offs to consider

• You need a consistent template so your videos do not feel scattered.
• Some tools require more assembly work, which means you should budget time for editing.

5) AI video competitors that focus on photoreal motion and face consistency

There are AI video competitors that lean harder into face consistency and natural motion, especially when you are aiming for a “human-like” delivery style. These tend to be appealing when you have higher expectations for realism, or when your audience is sensitive to artifacts.

This category can be a great fit if your brand is strict about presenter presence. For example, executive communications often benefit from a more lifelike delivery. It is not just aesthetics, it is trust.

What to test before you scale

• How the avatar handles quick sentences
• Whether emotion stays consistent across different scripts
• The stability of facial features during transitions
• Export quality, especially for social platforms with compression
• Whether the tool supports multiple avatars under the same brand style

I recommend running a short pilot with your real scripts. Sample text is rarely the same as your actual content, and speed often reveals problems you would not notice in a single demo.

Trade-offs to consider

• More realism can mean more constraints.
• Some competitors cost more or require more setup to maintain consistent output.

Picking the right alternative for your next project

The fastest way to choose among real time avatar video alternatives is to match the tool to your workflow reality.

Ask yourself: – Do you need last-minute script changes, like a live webinar? – Are you building a content library, or just a few hero videos? – How important is lip-sync accuracy compared to narrative clarity? – Do you have editing support, or does the tool need to do most of the work?

If you want, I can help you narrow this down. Tell me what you are making (webinar, training, sales, internal updates), your typical video length, and whether you need one avatar or several. Then I will suggest the best fit among these five approaches and what to test first so you get results quickly.